VIEW PROJECTS
Detailed project information for the project selected is shown below. Click on the tabs near the top of the screen to switch between
Basic Information, Goals and Planning Context, Project Costs and Funding, Project Schedule, Air Quality Planning, and EIR Analysis.
|
Reference Number: 230671
|
Project/Program: I-880 northbound in Alameda County from 16th Avenue to Bay Bridge Toll Plaza – conver...
|
| Reference Number:
| 230671 |
| Project/Program:
| I-880 northbound in Alameda County from 16th Avenue to Bay Bridge Toll Plaza – convert HOV lane to express lane | |
| Purpose:
| To accelerate completion of the HOV system (to serve carpoolers and express bus) and offer a reliable travel option. | |
| Scope:
| I-880 northbound in Alameda County from 16th Avenue to Bay Bridge Toll Plaza – convert HOV lane to express lane. | |
| Notes:
| | |
| County: | Bay Area Region/Multi-County | |
| Corridor:
View Map | Eastshore-South | |
| Contact Agency: | MTC | |
Goal 1: Safe and Well Maintained System

Ensuring the safety of travelers is a priority for all government agencies engaged in transportation, whether the trip is motorized or non-motorized. Efforts to reduce collisions, fatalities and injuries include making strategic investments in safety education, enforcement and engineering. The public also expects transportation facilities to be kept in a state of good repair, which requires diligence in attending to ongoing maintenance and rehabilitation needs. Maintaining the condition of the Bay Area’s transportation infrastructure will enhance the region’s economic growth potential and will help ensure the continued livability of existing neighborhoods and downtowns.
|  |
Goal 5: Clean Air

Air quality planning in the Bay Area is designed to have the region attain and maintain standards for healthy air set by the federal and state government. Over the last two decades, state and regional air quality agencies have made steady progress in reducing ozone precursors (smog) and carbon monoxide emissions from all sources, but new, more stringent standards for ozone and fine particulate matter will pose new challenges. Long-term trends show a continued decline in emissions of both ozone precursors and carbon monoxide emissions from cars and trucks, primarily as a result of strict state emission requirements for new cars. While new federal controls on commercial trucks will reduce emissions from these engines, additional motor vehicle and freight travel will lead to increased levels of particulates overall. The public health impacts of localized particulate matter emissions for communities located near port/railroad activities and truck corridors must be mitigated.
|  |
Goal 2: Reliable Commute

The public perceives the need to fine-tune the system at key locations, where people connect between modes. Good connections require a range of strategies from removing physical barriers, to making it easier to pay fares, to better information and way-finding signage, to having more services to connect to. Low-cost strategies such as uniform signage will help us to make great strides towards a cohesive, seamless system.
Finally, whether people make trips by bike, transit, or car, they desire a certain amount of predictability in terms of how long their trip will take. The manufacturing and freight shipping industries also depend heavily on the delivery of products within specified time windows.
|  |
Goal 6: Efficient Freight Movement

Expected increases in population, growing international trade with the Pacific Rim, and a resurgent economy will contribute to increased truck and rail freight movement throughout the region, especially near the Bay Area’s major airports and seaports. Both congestion on key freight routes and the reliability of trip times have become major concerns for those who move freight within, into and out of the Bay Area. Furthermore, the environmental impacts of moving freight on local communities must also be considered, and to the extent feasible and cost-effective, mitigated, including air pollution, noise, local traffic congestion, and neighborhood access and safety. The increasing cost of moving freight in the region could contribute to a higher cost of living, while impediments in shipping freight could lead some industries to relocate. The needs of the goods movement industry should be better integrated into local land use and development decisions.
|  |
Goal 3: Access to Mobility

MTC must consider the needs of all travelers in order to determine equitable distribution of mobility benefits. Certain segments of the population have fewer mobility options and therefore require special attention in transportation planning: households without a car, school children, older adults, and persons with disabilities. As the Bay Area’s aging population grows and the physical challenges associated with aging increases, more attention needs to be focused on where older adults and persons with disabilities live and how they travel. Removing existing barriers to mobility—physical, informational, and/or financial—for older adults, the disabled, low-income persons, and school children is a shared responsibility between the individual rider and many organizations, including transportation and social service agencies.
|  |
Goal 7: Climate Protection

The continued warming of the earth’s atmosphere will have numerous implications for the State and Bay Area, from health and environmental issues to impacts on the Bay Area’s transportation infrastructure with rising sea levels. While climate protection is a global issue that requires global solutions, the Bay Area can be a model for California, the nation, and the world. Transportation is nearly completely reliant on petroleum for fuel, thus the amount of regional travel and the efficiency of the vehicles used to transport people and goods will be a major determinant of the amount of greenhouse gases (GHGs) produced by Bay Area travel activity. At the same time, critical elements of the transportation infrastructure (highway, rail, and airports) could face flooding as sea levels continue to rise. The state is committed to reduce its GHG emissions to 2000 levels by 2010, to 1990 levels by 2020, and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
|  |
Goal 4: Livable Communities

As the region continues to grow, it is prudent to support a more focused growth pattern through infill, higher intensity, transit-oriented, and/or mixed-use developments. Such land-uses can provide significant benefits by encouraging shorter commute trips, more walking and bicycling, and a less auto-oriented lifestyle. Local governments will need regulatory change, financial support and incentives from the federal, state and the region levels to implement these desired land-uses.
|  |
Goal 8: Security and Emergency Management

The Bay Area needs to be ready for a number of possible future natural and man-made emergencies, including earthquakes, floods, industrial accidents, and terrorist threats. In order to maintain a high level of preparedness for all risks, it will be necessary to address both pre-event prevention, protection, and detection, as well as post-event emergency response, recovery, and reconstruction. Strategic financial planning is also necessary to ensure that there will be adequate resources available to address transportation security and other emergencies when needed. Cutting federal red tape will also be necessary to ensure timely reimbursement of funds used to repair damaged transportation infrastructure.
|  |
|
Major Investment Study:
|  |
Corridor Study:
|  |
|
Project Study Report:
|  |
Congestion Management Plan:
|  |
|
Sales Tax Measure:
|  |
County Transportation Plan:
|  |
|
RM 1 Toll Bridge Program:
|  |
RM 2 Regional Traffic Relief Program:
|  |
|
Short Range Transit Plan:
|  |
Traffic Congestion Relief Program:
|  |
|
MTC Blueprint:
|  |
Resolution 3434 Transit Expansion:
|  |
|
Regional Plan/Study:
|  |
Proposition 1B Congestion Mobility Improvement Account:
|  |
|
Regional Goods Movement Plan:
|  |
Regional Rail Plan:
|  |
|
Freeway Performance Initiative:
|  |
Regional Operations Program:
|  |
|
Regional High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Network Study:
|  |
Community-Based Transportation Plans:
|  |
|
Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Plan:
|  |
Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC):
|  |
|
Transit Connectivity Study:
|  |
Other Plan:
|  |
|
Bicycle/Pedestrian Plans:
|  |
|
|
|
Note: Funding and cost amounts for projects included in the Bay Area Express Lane Network are at the corridor level as shown in Appendix One of the Transportation 2035 Plan.
|
1Committed Funds have been reserved by law for specific uses, or allocated by MTC action prior to the development of the Transportation 2035 Plan.
2Discretionary Funds are flexible funds available to MTC (and not already programmed in Committed Funds) for assignment to projects via the Transportation 2035 Plan planning process.
|
Start
|
End
| |
|
Environmental Clearance:
| | | |
|
Design:
| | | |
|
Right-Of-Way:
| | | |
|
Construction:
| | 2015 | |
Search MTC's Fund Management System (FMS) to determine if a certain project from the
Transportation 2035 Plan is listed in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
The TIP identifies projects that are to receive federal funding, are subject to federal
action, or are deemed regionally significant for transportation conformity purposes.
Search methods in the FMS include county, project name, and unique reference number as
assigned in the TIP (TIP ID) or regional transportation plan (RTP ID). Note: RTP ID
search function will be available by summer 2009. Visit FMS at www.mtc.ca.gov/funding.
|
|